Due to this, online and phone account access, including payments, are unavailable right now. Spires natural gas utilities and natural gas-related.The company behind the Spire STL pipeline is seeking an emergency authorization to keep the project operating after a landmark court ruling last month axed a key approval for the natural gas conduit.This morning, a Spire fiber optic cable line was damaged. At Spire, we believe the greatest energy in the world comes from one sourcepeople.Were dedicated to understanding our customers needs and goals to better serve them today and tomorrow. We are committed to transforming our business and pursuing growth through 1) growing organically, 2) investing in infrastructure, 3) advancing through innovation. Our natural gas-related businesses include Spire Marketing, Spire STL Pipeline and Spire Storage.
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. Louis County on Thursday, July 8, 2021. Louis area.Natural gas arrives via the Spire STL Pipeline to Spires Laclede/Lange Delivery Station in north St. Submitted a request yesterday for the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to issue an emergency certificate allowing the pipeline to temporarily keep carrying natural gas to the St. We’re very sorry for any inconvenience, and check back for ongoing updates.Spire Inc.
Louis area.In its decision, the D.C. As the commission considers its options, the company is looking to protect its customers from suddenly losing service ahead of the winter months, he said.“We are keenly interested in cooperating with FERC to find a solution for this,” Jamieson said.When FERC approved the Spire pipeline in 2018, the Environmental Defense Fund and other critics of the project said the company had failed to demonstrate a need for more natural gas to be delivered to the St. Circuit’s “unprecedented” decision to eliminate a certificate for an in-service pipeline has left the fate of the project’s operation in FERC’s control, said Sean Jamieson, Spire STL’s general counsel.
Louis customers should be compromised,” Karas said in an emailed statement today. Circuit had ruled against FERC’s approval after finding the commission hadn’t considered evidence of self-dealing, she said.“No one has suggested that service to St. Spire is currently engaged in condemnation hearings for about 40 landowners in Missouri and Illinois whose properties are located in the pipeline’s right of way and who did not reach voluntary agreements with the company, said Elefant.Given that those proceedings are underway or will begin in a couple months, it would be helpful for FERC to take some action or “at least send some signals” before the company is potentially given legal title to more landowners’ properties, Elefant said.Natalie Karas, lead counsel at EDF, said the company was facing a “problem of Spire STL’s own making” after choosing to proceed with the $280 million project over opposition and two dissenting opinions from FERC commissioners. Circuit told it to take.”FERC could also impose conditions on the project, which might include requirements that the company remedy landowners’ concerns about the pipeline’s impacts, if it were to issue an emergency certificate, Elefant added. “So any action FERC takes, it’s OK if it’s a Band-Aid, but what it can’t do is put Spire in a position where FERC isn’t able to carry out the mandate that the D.C. Circuit said, ‘We’re doubtful FERC should rehabilitate this certificate,’” she said.
0 kommentar(er)
